首页> 外文OA文献 >A New View on an Old Debate: Type of Cue-Conflict Manipulation and Availability of Stars Can Explain the Discrepancies between Cue-Calibration Experiments with Migratory Songbirds.
【2h】

A New View on an Old Debate: Type of Cue-Conflict Manipulation and Availability of Stars Can Explain the Discrepancies between Cue-Calibration Experiments with Migratory Songbirds.

机译:旧辩论的新视角:提示 - 冲突操纵的类型和星的可用性可以解释提示 - 校准实验与洄游鸣鸟的差异。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Migratory birds use multiple compass systems for orientation, including a magnetic, star and sun/polarized light compass. To keep these compasses in register, birds have to regularly update them with respect to a common reference. However, cue-conflict studies have revealed contradictory results on the compass hierarchy, favoring either celestial or magnetic compass cues as the primary calibration reference. Both the geomagnetic field and polarized light cues present at sunrise and sunset have been shown to play a role in compass cue integration, and evidence suggests that polarized light cues at sunrise and sunset may provide the primary calibration reference for the other compass systems. We tested whether migratory garden warblers recalibrated their compasses when they were exposed to the natural celestial cues at sunset in a shifted magnetic field, which are conditions that have been shown to be necessary for the use of a compass reference based on polarized light cues. We released the birds on the same evening under a starry sky and followed them by radio tracking. We found no evidence of compass recalibration, even though the birds had a full view of polarized light cues near the horizon at sunset during the cue-conflict exposure. Based on a meta-analysis of the available literature, we propose an extended unifying theory on compass cue hierarchy used by migratory birds to calibrate the different compasses. According to this scheme, birds recalibrate their magnetic compass by sunrise/sunset polarized light cues, provided they have access to the vertically aligned band of maximum polarization near the horizon and a view of landmarks. Once the stars appear in the sky, the birds then recalibrate the star compass with respect of the recalibrated magnetic compass. If sunrise and sunset information can be viewed from the same location, the birds average the information to get a true geographic reference. If polarized light information is not available near the horizon at sunrise or sunset, the birds temporarily transfer the previously calibrated magnetic compass information to the available celestial compasses. We conclude that the type of cue-conflict manipulation and the availability of stars can explain the discrepancies between studies.
机译:候鸟使用多个指南针系统进行定向,包括磁性,星状和太阳/偏振光指南针。为了使这些指南针保持对准状态,鸟类必须定期针对公共参考进行更新。但是,提示冲突研究发现指南针层次结构上存在矛盾的结果,倾向于天体或磁性指南针作为主要的校准参考。日出和日落时存在的地磁场和偏振光提示均已显示出指南针提示集成中的作用,并且证据表明日出和日落时的偏振光提示可为其他指南针系统提供主要的校准参考。我们测试了迁移的花园莺在日落时在偏移磁场中暴露于自然天体线索时是否重新校准了他们的指南针,这已证明是使用基于偏振光线索的指南针参考所必需的条件。我们于当晚在繁星点点的天空下放飞了这些鸟,并通过无线电跟踪它们。我们没有发现指南针重新校准的证据,即使在线索冲突暴露期间在日落时鸟在地平线附近也能看到偏振光线索的全貌。在对现有文献进行荟萃分析的基础上,我们提出了一种关于候鸟用来校准不同指南针的指南针提示层次结构的扩展统一理论。根据此方案,鸟类可以通过日出/日落偏振光提示重新校准其磁罗盘,前提是它们可以进入地平线附近具有最大偏振的垂直对齐的波段并可以看到地标。一旦星星出现在天空中,鸟儿便会根据重新校准的电磁罗盘重新校准星罗盘。如果可以从同一位置查看日出和日落信息,则鸟类对信息进行平均以获取真实的地理参考。如果在日出或日落时地平线附近没有偏振光信息,则鸟类会暂时将先前已校准的磁罗盘信息传输到可用的天罗盘。我们得出结论,提示冲突操作的类型和星星的可用性可以解释研究之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号